Assessment of hormonal levels as prognostic markers and of their optimal cut-offs in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours grade 2
-
Published:2020-11-26
Issue:3
Volume:72
Page:893-904
-
ISSN:1355-008X
-
Container-title:Endocrine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Endocrine
Author:
Papantoniou DimitriosORCID, Grönberg Malin, Landerholm Kalle, Welin Staffan, Ziolkowska Barbara, Nordvall Dennis, Janson Eva Tiensuu
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (siNETs) with a Ki-67 proliferation index between 3 and 20% belong to WHO grade 2. Response to treatment may be monitored by blood chromogranin A (CgA) and urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the prognostic value of baseline CgA and 5HIAA and of the early biochemical response to treatment, and to compare different cut-off values used in the literature.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study of 184 patients with siNET Grade 2 treated with somatostatin analogues (SSA), interferon-alpha (IFN) or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).
Results
Baseline CgA was a statistically significant prognostic marker for both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A cut-off of 5 × ULN (upper limit of normal) was best discriminative in most cases, but 2 × ULN discriminated better for SSA. Baseline 5HIAA was a prognostic marker for CSS in treatment with IFN and PRRT, but not for single SSA. Early changes of CgA and 5HIAA correlated well with CSS (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.82–5.56 and HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16–1.86) and PFS (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.86–5.10 and HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11–1.68) for SSA, but not for PRRT.
Conclusions
Baseline CgA and to a lesser extent 5HIAA are associated with CSS irrespective of treatment used, and with PFS after PRRT, and 5 × ULN provides best discrimination in many, but not all, cases. Early reductions of CgA and 5HIAA are prognostic for treatment with SSA, but not PRRT.
Funder
Futurum - Akademin för Hälsa och Vård, Region Jönköpings läns
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Reference34 articles.
1. B. Niederle, U.-F. Pape, F. Costa, D. Gross, F. Kelestimur, U. Knigge, K. Öberg, M. Pavel, A. Perren, C. Toumpanakis, J. O”Connor, D. O”Toole, E. Krenning, N. Reed, R. Kianmanesh; Participants, all other V.C.C., ENETS consensus guidelines update for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the jejunum and ileum. Neuroendocrinology 103, 125–138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1159/000443170 2. D. Klimstra, G. Kloppell, S. Rosa La, G. Rindi, Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. WHO classification of tumours: digestive system tumours, 5th ed, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 2019) 3. D. Man, J. Wu, Z. Shen, X. Zhu, Prognosis of patients with neuroendocrine tumor: a SEER database analysis. Cancer Manag. Res. 10, 5629–5638 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S174907 4. E. Andersson, Y. Arvidsson, C. Swärd, T. Hofving, B. Wängberg, E. Kristiansson, O. Nilsson, Expression profiling of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors identifies subgroups with clinical relevance, prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. Mod. Pathol. 29, 616–629 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2016.48 5. V. Marotta, V. Nuzzo, T. Ferrara, A. Zuccoli, M. Masone, L. Nocerino, M.D. Prete, F. Marciello, V. Ramundo, G. Lombardi, M. itale, A. Colao, A. Faggiano, Limitations of chromogranin A in clinical practice. Biomark. Biochem. Indic. Expo. Response Susceptibility Chem. 17, 186–191 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3109/1354750X.2012.654511
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|