Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Iodine is an essential micronutrient required for thyroid hormone biosynthesis. However, overtreatment with iodine can unfavorably affect thyroid physiology. The aim of this review is to present the evidence that iodine—when in excess—can interfere with thyroid hormone synthesis and, therefore, can act as a potential endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC), and that this action, as well as other abnormalities in the thyroid, occurs—at least partially—via oxidative stress.
Methods
We reviewed published studies on iodine as a potential EDC, with particular emphasis on the phenomenon of oxidative stress.
Results
This paper summarizes current knowledge on iodine excess in the context of its properties as an EDC and its effects on oxidative processes.
Conclusion
Iodine does fulfill the criteria of an EDC because it is an exogenous chemical that interferes—when in excess—with thyroid hormone synthesis. However, this statement cannot change general rules regarding iodine supply, which means that iodine deficiency should be still eliminated worldwide and, at the same time, iodine excess should be avoided. Universal awareness that iodine is a potential EDC would make consumers more careful regarding their diet and what they supplement in tablets, and—what is of great importance—it would make caregivers choose iodine-containing medications (or other chemicals) more prudently. It should be stressed that compared to iodine deficiency, iodine in excess (acting either as a potential EDC or via other mechanisms) is much less harmful in such a sense that it affects only a small percentage of sensitive individuals, whereas the former affects whole populations; therefore, it causes endemic consequences.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Reference204 articles.
1. R.T. Zoeller, T.R. Brown, L.L. Doan, A.C. Gore, N.E. Skakkebaek, A.M. Soto, T.J. Woodruff, F.S. Vom Saal, Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society. Endocrinology 153, 4097–4110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1422
2. R.J. Kavlock, G.P. Daston, C. DeRosa, P. Fenner-Crisp, L.E. Gray, S. Kaattari, G. Lucier, M. Luster, M.J. Mac, C. Maczka, R. Miller, J. Moore, R. Rolland, G. Scott, D.M. Sheehan, T. Sinks, H.A. Tilson, Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. Environ. Health Perspect. 104(Suppl 4), 715–740 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.96104s4715
3. European Comission. European workshop on the impact of endocrine disruptors on human health and wildlife, in Environment and Climate Research Programme. (European Commission, Brussels, 1996)
4. T. Damstra, S. Barlow, A. Bergman, R. Kavlock, G. Van der Krak. International Program on Chemical Safety: Global assessment of the state-of-the-science of endocrine disruptors: an assessment prepared by an expert group on behalf of the World Health Organization, the International Labour Organisation, and the United Nations Environment Programme. (World Health Organisation, Geneva, 2002)
5. E. Brehm, J.A. Flaws, Transgenerational effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on male and female reproduction. Endocrinology 160, 1421–1435 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2019-00034
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献