Comparison between total thyroidectomy and hemithyroidectomy in TIR3B thyroid nodules management

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Thyroid nodules classified as TIR3B according to SIAPEC 2014 are considered a clinical challenge due to the risk to be malignant. This retrospective study aimed to compare the performances of total thyroidectomy (TT) and hemithyroidectomy (HT) in the surgical management of a consecutive cohort of patients affected by TIR3B thyroid nodule in terms of side effects and the rate of malignancy detected. Methods From 2011 to 2019, 136 (111 women, 25 men; average age of 53.5 years) patients having a thyroid nodule with a cytological diagnosis of TIR3B who underwent TT or HT were retrospectively included. Results Out of 136 patients, 106 (78%) received TT, while the remaining 30 (22%) HT. The final diagnosis was malignant in 65 patients (48%), with follicular variant of papillary carcinoma as the most frequent. The diagnosis of malignancy was significantly more common in the TT group with 56 patients (53%) compared to the HT group with 9 cases (30%) (p = 0.001). Patients who underwent TT were significantly older, had larger nodules and the time between diagnosis and surgery was significantly longer compared to HT (p = 0.001; p0.003; p = 0.002). No main post-surgical complications were registered, except for one case of transient hypocalcemia in a patient who underwent TT. Conclusions Our data showed a malignancy rate of TIR3B lesions higher than expected (48%). Both TT and HT seem to be effective approaches for the treatment of TIR3B nodules with a very low rate of post-surgical comorbidities. In the choice of surgical approach, it is crucial to consider the presence of risk factors (clinical and ultrasound characteristics), nodule size, patients’ opinion, and surgeon’s skills and experience.