Author:
Alexander Veronika,Dannhäuser Laura,Zak Paul J.
Abstract
AbstractStimulating and sustaining teamwork can be a strategic asset for an organization. Yet, little has been done to objectively assess how office design affects team performance. We conducted a neuroscience field experiment of employees (N = 96) to examine how different open-office configurations impact three measures of neurophysiologic stress, affect, and creative problem-solving in three existing office configurations that varied in their degree of openness. Physiologic stress was lowest in the most open work setting resulting in higher performance and more rapid post-work physiologic recovery compared to less open configurations. We identified three core factors driving these results: high perceived privacy, a more pleasant ambience, and increased autonomy. This multimodal approach identifies neurophysiologic mechanisms linking office design to team performance.
Funder
Claremont Graduate University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference116 articles.
1. Aanes, M. M., Mittelmark, M. B., & Hetland, J. (2009). The experience of loneliness: Main and interactive effects of interpersonal stress, social support and positive affect. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 11(4), 25–33.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research Inorganizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
3. Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.
4. Anusha, A. S., Jose, J., Preejith, S. P., Jayaraj, J., & Mohanasankar, S. (2018). Physiological signal based work stress detection using unobtrusive sensors. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, 4(6), 065001.
5. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.