Abstract
AbstractUnstable interpersonal relationships and fear of abandonment are core symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) that often intensify during stress. Psychosocial stress, which includes components of social exclusion and increases cortisol secretion, enhances emotional empathy in healthy individuals. Women with BPD, on the contrary, react with reduced emotional empathy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of perceived social exclusion without accompanying cortisol increase on empathy in women with BPD and healthy women. To induce social exclusion, we randomized 98 women with BPD and 98 healthy women to either an exclusion or an overinclusion (control) condition of Cyberball, a virtual ball game. Subsequently, participants underwent the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET), which assesses cognitive and emotional empathy. There was no increase in cortisol release after Cyberball. Cognitive empathy did not differ between groups or conditions. Women with BPD reported lower emotional empathy for positive emotions (group by valence interaction), but not for negative emotions. Exploratory analyses suggested that this effect might be more pronounced after social exclusion. Our results confirm previous findings that cognitive empathy does not differ between women with BPD and healthy women and extend this evidence to social exclusion. Emotional empathy in women with BPD seems to be more sensitive to the effects of stress or ambiguous social situations. Specifically, emotional empathy seems to be reduced for positive emotions, and might further decline after social exclusion. Empathic reactions to emotional stimuli of different valences and to specific emotions should be further investigated.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine
Reference57 articles.
1. American Psychological Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychological Association, Arlington
2. Bass EC, Stednitz SJ, Simonson K, Shen T, Gahtan E (2014) Physiological stress reactivity and empathy following social exclusion: a test of the defensive emotional analgesia hypothesis. Soc Neurosci 9(5):504–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.929533
3. Beesdo-Baum K, Zaudig M, First MB, Wittchen HU (2019) SCID-5-PD: Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-5-Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Deutsche Bearbeitung des Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5—personality disorders von Michael B. First, Janet B.W. Williams, Lorna Smith Benjamin, Robert L. Spitzer. Hogrefe, Göttingen
4. Bohus M, Kleindienst N, Limberger MF, Stieglitz RD, Domsalla M, Chapman AL, Wolf M (2009) The short version of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23): development and initial data on psychometric properties. Psychopathology 42(1):32–39. https://doi.org/10.1159/000173701
5. Buchanan TW, Preston SD (2014) Stress leads to prosocial action in immediate need situations. Front Behav Neurosci 8:5–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00005
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献