Minor tranquillizers for short-term treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials
-
Published:2023-08-25
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0940-1334
-
Container-title:European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
Author:
Munkholm KlausORCID, Ussing Anja, Brink Maria, Edemann-Callesen Henriette, Canbolat Sengül Sari, Christensen Robin, Dahl Kristine Søgaard, Ebdrup Bjørn H., Jensen Mikkel Erik Juul, Kierulf-Lassen Casper, Madsen Gitte Krogh, Nielsen Sabrina Mai, Paulsen Camilla Paludan, Rohde Jeanett Friis, Tarp Simon, Baandrup Lone
Abstract
AbstractUnspecific symptoms of anxiety and distress are frequently encountered in patients in both general practice and acute psychiatric services. Minor tranquillizers may be a treatment option when non-pharmacological interventions are insufficient or unavailable. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis of the evidence for short-term (1–4 weeks) pharmacological treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress. We searched the PsycInfo, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases and extracted data following a predefined hierarchy of outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (GRADE). We included 34 randomized trials comprising a total of 7044 patients with adjustment disorders or anxiety spectrum disorders. The network meta-analysis showed that regarding the critical outcome symptoms of anxiety within 1–4 weeks benzodiazepines (SMD − 0.58, 95% CI − 0.77 to − 0.40), quetiapine (SMD − 0.51, 95% CI − 0.90 to − 0.13) and pregabalin (SMD − 0.58, 95% CI − 0.87 to − 0.28) all performed better than placebo with no statistically significant difference between the drugs. Data on other important outcomes were inconsistently reported. Adverse effects varied, but overall, it was uncertain whether adverse effects differed between interventions. The evidence regarding the risk of dependence was uncertain, but dependence may be a concern in susceptible individuals even with short-term treatment. Overall, the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE was rated as low to very low across outcomes. Despite the limitations in the evidence, the results of this review can inform treatment guidelines, supporting clinicians in the choice of minor tranquillizer in this prevalent and help-seeking, clinically heterogeneous population.
Funder
Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine
Reference80 articles.
1. Albus M, Lecrubier Y, Maier W, Buller R, Rosenberg R, Hippius H (1990) Drug treatment of panic disorder: early response to treatment as a predictor of final outcome. Acta Psychiatr Scand 82:359–365 2. Amore M, Magnani K, Cerisoli M, Casagrande C, Ferrari G (1999) Panic disorder. A long-term treatment study: fluoxetine vs imipramine. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 14:429–434 3. Ansseau M, Bataille M, Briole G, de Nayer A, Fauchere PA, Ferrero F, Van Moffaert M (1996) Controlled comparison of tianeptine, alprazolam and mianserin in the treatment of adjustment disorders with anxiety and depression. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 11:293–298 4. Bakish D, Saxena BM, Bowen R, D’Souza J (1993) Reversible monoamine oxidase-a inhibitors in panic disorder. Clin Neuropharmacol 16(Suppl 2):S77-82 5. Bighelli I, Trespidi C, Castellazzi M, Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Girlanda F, Guaiana G, Koesters M, Barbui C (2016) Antidepressants and benzodiazepines for panic disorder in adults. The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD011567
|
|