Insight in cognitive impairment assessed with the Cognitive Assessment Interview in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia

Author:

Bucci Paola,Mucci Armida,Giordano Giulia M.,Caporusso Edoardo,Giuliani Luigi,Gibertoni Dino,Rossi Alessandro,Rocca Paola,Bertolino Alessandro,Galderisi Silvana,Piegari Giuseppe,Merlotti Eleonora,Brando Francesco,Papalino Marco,Calia Vitalba,Romano Raffaella,Barlati Stefano,Deste Giacomo,Valsecchi Paolo,Pinna Federica,Lai Alice,Lostia Di Santa Sofia Silvia,Signorelli Maria Salvina,Poli Laura Fusar,Surace Teresa,Martinotti Giovanni,Montemitro Chiara,Fatricelli Silvia,Altamura Mario,Angelini Eleonora,Elia Antonella,Calcagno Pietro,Belvederi Murri Martino,Cattedra Simone,Pacitti Francesca,Rossi Rodolfo,Socci Valentina,Giusti Laura,Salza Anna,Mammarella Silvia,de Bartolomeis Andrea,Favaro Angela,Collantoni Enrico,Meneguzzo Paolo,Tonna Matteo,Ossola Paolo,Gerra Maria Lidia,Gramaglia Carla,Binda Valeria,Gambaro Eleonora,Carmassi Claudia,Carpita Barbara,Cremone Ivan Mirko,Corrivetti Giulio,Cascino Giammarco,Del Buono Gianfranco,Brugnoli Roberto,Comparelli Anna,Corigliano Valentina,Buzzanca Antonio,Gerardi Nicoletta,Frascarelli Marianna,Fagiolini Andrea,Goracci Arianna,Bolognesi Simone,Siracusano Alberto,Di Lorenzo Giorgio,Ribolsi Michele,Montemagni Cristiana,Riccardi Cecilia,Del Favero Elisa,

Abstract

AbstractThe Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). The present study aimed at assessing, in a large sample of SCZ (n = 601), the agreement between patients and their informants on CAI ratings, to explore patients’ insight in their cognitive deficits and its relationships with clinical and functional indices. Agreement between patient- and informant-based ratings was assessed by the Gwet’s agreement coefficient. Predictors of insight in cognitive deficits were explored by stepwise multiple regression analyses. Patients reported lower severity of cognitive impairment vs. informants. A substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between patients’ and informants’ ratings. Lower insight in cognitive deficits was associated to greater severity of neurocognitive impairment and positive symptoms, lower severity of depressive symptoms, and older age. Worse real-life functioning was associated to lower insight in cognitive deficit, worse neurocognitive performance, and worse functional capacity. Our findings indicate that the CAI is a valid co-primary measure with the interview to patients providing a reliable assessment of their cognitive deficits. In the absence of informants with good knowledge of the subject, the interview to the patient may represent a valid alternative.

Funder

Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3