Abstract
AbstractReducing material waste and computation time are primary objectives in cutting and packing problems (C &P). A solution to the C &P problem consists of many steps, including the grouping of items to be nested and the arrangement of the grouped items on a large object. Current algorithms use meta-heuristics to solve the arrangement problem directly without explicitly addressing the grouping problem. In this paper, we propose a new pipeline for the nesting problem that starts with grouping the items to be nested and then arranging them on large objects. To this end, we introduce and motivate a new concept, namely the Geometrical Compatibility Index (GCI). Items with higher GCI should be clustered together. Since no labels exist for GCIs, we propose to model GCIs as bidirectional weighted edges of a graph that we call geometrical relationship graph (GRG). We propose a novel reinforcement-learning-based framework, which consists of two graph neural networks trained in an actor-critic-like fashion to learn GCIs. Then, to group the items into clusters, we model the GRG as a capacitated vehicle routing problem graph and solve it using meta-heuristics. Experiments conducted on a private dataset with regularly and irregularly shaped items show that the proposed algorithm can achieve a significant reduction in computation time (30% to 48%) compared to an open-source nesting software while attaining similar trim loss on regular items and a threefold improvement in trim loss on irregular items.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Software
Reference24 articles.
1. Arenales, M., Morabito, R., & Yanasse, H. (1999). Special issue: Cutting and packing problems. Pesquisa Operacional, 19, 107–299.
2. Barto, A. G., Sutton, R. S., & Anderson, C. W. (1983). Neuronlike adaptive elements that can solve difficult learning control problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 5, 834–846.
3. Cagan, J., Shimada, K., & Yin, S. (2002). A survey of computational approaches to three-dimensional layout problems. Computer-Aided Design, 34, 597–611.
4. Dyckhoff, H. (1990). A typology of cutting and packing problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 44, 145–159.
5. Faina, L. (2020). A survey on the cutting and packing problems. Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana, 13, 567–572.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献