Abstract
AbstractNumerous efforts in the additive manufacturing literature have been made toward in-situ defect prediction for process control and optimization. However, the current work in the literature is limited by the need for multi-sensory data in appropriate resolution and scale to capture defects reliably and the need for systematic experimental and data-driven modeling validation to prove utility. For the first time in literature, we propose a data-driven neural network framework capable of in-situ micro-porosity localization for laser powder bed fusion via exclusively within hatch strip of sensory data, as opposed to a three-dimensional neighborhood of sensory data. We further propose using prior-guided neural networks to utilize the often-abundant nominal data in the form of a prior loss, enabling the machine learning structure to comply more with process physics. The proposed methods are validated via rigorous experimental data sets of high-strength aluminum A205 parts, repeated k-fold cross-validation, and prior-guided validation. Using exclusively within hatch stripe data, we detect and localize porosity with a spherical equivalent diameter (SED) smaller than $$50.00\,\upmu $$
50.00
μ
m with a classification accuracy of $$73.13\pm 1.57\%$$
73.13
±
1.57
%
This is the first work in the literature demonstrating in-situ localization of porosities as small as $$38.12\,\upmu m$$
38.12
μ
m
SED and is more than a five-fold improvement on the smallest SED porosity localization via spectral emissions sensory data in the literature. In-situ localizing micro-porosity using exclusively within hatch-stripe data is a significant step towards within-layer defect mitigation, advanced process feedback control, and compliance with the reliability certification requirements of industries such as the aerospace industry.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Software
Reference68 articles.
1. ASTM, ISO, et al. (2015). ASTM ISO/astm52900-15 standard terminology for additive manufacturing–general principles–terminology. https://doi.org/10.1520/ISOASTM52900-15
2. Atwya, M., & Panoutsos, G. (2019). Transient thermography for flaw detection in friction stir welding: A machine learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(7), 4423–4435.
3. Atwya, M., & Panoutsos, G. (2022). Structure optimization of prior-knowledge-guided neural networks. Neurocomputing, 491, 464–488.
4. Bellgran, M., & Säfsten, E. K. (2009). Production Development: Design and Operation of Production Systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-495-9
5. Blakey-Milner, B., Gradl, P., Snedden, G., et al. (2021). Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review. Materials & Design, 209(110), 008.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献