Abstract
AbstractThe demand for individualized products drives modern manufacturing systems towards greater adaptability and flexibility. This increases the focus on data-driven digital twins enabling swift adaptations. Within the framework of cyber-physical systems, the digital twin is a digital model that is fully connected to the physical and digital assets. A digital model must follow a standardization for interoperable data exchange. Established ontologies and meta-models offer a basis in the definition of a schema, which is the first phase of creating a digital twin. The next phase is the standardized and structured modeling with static use-case specific data. The final phase is the deployment of digital twins into operation with a full connection of the digital model with the remaining cyber-physical system. In this deployment phase communication standards and protocols provide a standardized data exchange. A survey on the state-of-the-art of these three digital twin phases reveals the lack of a consistent workflow from ontology-driven definition to standardized modeling. Therefore, one goal of this paper is the design of an end-to-end digital twin pipeline to lower the threshold of creating and deploying digital twins. As the task of establishing a communication connection is highly repetitive, an automation concept by providing structured protocol data is the second goal. The planning and control of a line-less assembly system with manual stations and a mobile robot as resources and an industrial dog as the product serve as exemplary digital twin applications. Along this use-case the digital twin pipeline is transparently explained.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie
RWTH Aachen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Software
Reference76 articles.
1. AboElHassan, A., Sakr, A., & Yacout, S. (2021). A framework for digital twin deployment in production systems. In P. Weißgraeber, F. Heieck, & C. Ackermann (Eds.), Advances in Automotive Production Technology – Theory and Application (pp. 145–152, ARENA2036). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62962-8_17.
2. Acatech. (2011). Acatec position paper: Cyber-physical systems. Driving force for innovation in mobility, health, energy and production. 1. Aufl. Hg. v. Hellinger, A., and Seeger H. National Academy of Science and Engineering (2).
3. Andrew, A. M. (2004). Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce. Kybernetes, 33(9/10), 1544–1546. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920410556142
4. Antoniou, G., & van Harmelen, F. (2004). Web ontology language: OWL. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on ontologies. International handbooks on information systems (pp. 67–92). Springer.
5. Bader, S. R., Maleshkova, M., & Lohmann, S. (2019). Structuring reference architectures for the industrial Internet of Things. Future Internet, 11(7), 151.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献