Abstract
AbstractIn consequence of high cost pressure and the progressive globalization of markets, blanking, which represents the most economical process in the value chain of manufacturing companies, is particularly dependent on reducing machine downtimes and increasing the degree of utilization. For this purpose, it is necessary to be able to make a real-time prediction about the current and future process conditions even at high production rates. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of data acquisition, preprocessing and transformation on the performance of a multiclass support vector machine to classify abrasive wear states during blanking based on force signals. The performance of the model was quantitatively evaluated based on the model accuracy and the separability of the classes. As a result, it was shown, that the deviation of time series represents the key parameter for the resulting performance of the classification model and strongly depends on the sensor type and position, the preprocessing procedure as well as the feature extraction and selection. Furthermore, it is shown that the consideration of domain knowledge in the phases of data acquisition, preprocessing and transformation improves the performance of the classification model and is essential to successfully implement AI projects. Summarizing the findings of this study, trustworthy data sets play a crucial role for implementing an automated process monitoring as a basis for resilient manufacturing systems.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Software
Reference63 articles.
1. Addison, D. J. F., Wermter, S., & Arevian, G. Z. (2003). A comparison of feature extraction and selection techniques. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial neural networks (pp. 212–215).
2. Aydin, I., Karakose, M., & Akin, E. (2012). An adaptive artificial immune system for fault classification. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 1489–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0449-5
3. Bassiuny, A. M., Li, X., & Du, R. (2007). Fault diagnosis of stamping process based on empirical mode decomposition and learning vector quantization. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47, 2298–2306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.006
4. Baturynska, I., & Martinsen, K. (2021). Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: Comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01567-0
5. Blum, A. L., & Langley, P. (1997). Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning. Artificial Intelligence, 97, 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00063-5
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献