Assessment and comparison of thermochemical pathways for the rice residues valorization: pyrolysis and gasification

Abstract

AbstractLignocellulosic biomass conversion applying thermochemical routes has been postulated as an alternative for generating renewable energy. This research compares energy-driven biorefineries based on two thermochemical routes addressed to upgrade rice husk and rice straw produced in the Department of Sucre-Colombia. Initially, this research analyzes the physico-chemical and structural characterization of the rice residues. Four different scenarios were proposed to compare the energy-driven biorefineries based on fast pyrolysis and gasification considering technical, economic, and environmental metrics. These biorefineries were simulated using the Aspen Plus V.14.0 software. The novelty of this research is focused on the identification of the biorefinery with the best techno-economic, energetic, and environmental performance in the Colombian context. Economic and environmental analyses were done by using economic metrics and emissions. From an economic perspective, the stand-alone gasification process did not have a positive economic margin. In contrast, the fast pyrolysis process has the best economic performance since this process has a positive profit margin. Indeed, scenario 1 (fast pyrolysis of both rice residues) presented an economic margin of 13.75% and emissions of 2170.92 kgCO2eq/kg for 10 years. However, this scenario was not energetically the best, holding second place due to the feedstock requirements, compared to gasification. The biorefinery scenario 1 has the best performance.