Author:
San Martin Ruiz Macarena,Reiser Martin,Kranert Martin
Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated the performance of aerobic windrow systems by using coffee by-products and green waste to reduce gaseous emissions. Thereafter, a comparison with the current treatment and gaseous emissions at a Coffee Mill in Costa Rica was made. Two different studies where performed in Germany (pile I and II) and one study in a Coffee Mill in Costa Rica (pile III). Temperature, water content, and pH were the key parameters controlled over 35 days in all the systems. Moreover, CH4 emission rates were quantified by a FTIR and by a portable gas detector device where the emissions reached values 100 times higher when coffee by-products as a unique material for the composting process was used. Results show that highest emission rates during the composting process for pile I was 0.007 g(m2)−1 h−1, for pile II 0.006 g(m2)−1 h−1, and for pile III 3.1 g(m2)−1 h−1. It was found that CH4 emissions could be avoided if the mixture and the formation of the windrow piles were performed following the key parameter for composting, and the usage of additional material is used. With this, the reduction of CH4 emissions at the Mill in Costa Rica could be achieved in the future.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Pollution,Environmental Chemistry,General Medicine
Reference40 articles.
1. Ahn HK, Mulbry W, White JW, Kondrad SL (2011) Pile mixing increases greenhouse gas emissions during composting of dairy manure. Bioresour Technol 102:2904–2909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.142
2. Amlinger F, Peyr S, Cuhls C (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions from composting and mechanical biological treatment. Waste Manag Res 26(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07088432
3. Artola A, Barrena R, Colón J, Segura XF (2015) Composting of wastes decreasing the impact of abandoned mines on water bodies. View project MSW characterization View project. In: Resource Recovery to Approach Zero Municipal Waste. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18680-6
4. BGK (2017). Qualitätsmanagement-Handbuch (QMH), RAL-Gütesicherung Kompost (RAL-GZ 251). In B. G. K. (RAL-G. 251) BGK- Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V. (Ed.), QM-Handbuch Kompost (p. 45). Köln: BGK- Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V
5. Bidlingmaier W (2003). Methods book for the analysis of compost. Germany. Retrieved from https://www.kompost.de/fileadmin/docs/shop/Grundlagen_GS/Methods_Book_2002.pdf
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献