Abstract
AbstractGroundwater resources worldwide face significant challenges that require urgent implementation of sustainable measures for effective long-term management. Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is regarded as one of the most promising management technologies to address the degradation of groundwater resources. However, in urban aquifers, locating suitable areas that are least vulnerable to contamination for MAR implementation is complex and challenging. Hence, the present study proposes a framework encapsulating the combined assessment of groundwater vulnerability and MAR site suitability analysis to pinpoint the most featured areas for installing drywells in Kayseri, Turkey. To extrapolate the vulnerable zones, not only the original DRASTIC but also its multi-criteria decision-making (MCDA)–based modified variants were evaluated with regard to different hydrochemical parameters using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Besides, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) rationale was adopted to signify the importance level of criteria and the robustness of the framework was highlighted with sensitivity analysis. In addition, the decision layers and the attained vulnerability layer were combined using the weighted overlay (WOA). The findings indicate that the DRASTIC-SWARA correlates well with the arsenic (AUC = 0.856) and chloride (AUC = 0.648) and was adopted as the vulnerability model. Groundwater quality parameters such as chloride and sodium adsorption ratio, as well as the vadose zone thickness, were found to be the most significant decision parameters with importance levels of 16.75%, 14.51%, and 15.73%, respectively. Overall, 28.24% of the study area was unsuitable for recharge activities with high to very high vulnerability, while the remaining part was further prioritized into low to high suitability classes for MAR application. The proposed framework offers valuable tool to decision-makers for the delineation of favorable MAR sites with minimized susceptibility to contamination.
Funder
Istanbul Technical University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference143 articles.
1. ADEQ (2018) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality: guidance for design , installation , operation , maintenance and inspection of drywells. https://static.azdeq.gov/wqd/drywell/design_install_op_main_inspect.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2024
2. Ahani Amineh ZB, Hashemian SJAD, Magholi A (2017) Integrating spatial multi criteria decision making (SMCDM) with geographic information systems (GIS) for delineation of the most suitable areas for aquifer storage and recovery (ASR). J Hydrol 551:577–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.031
3. Ahirwar S, Malik MS, Ahirwar R, Shukla JP (2020) Identification of suitable sites and structures for artificial groundwater recharge for sustainable groundwater resource development and management. Groundw Sustain Dev 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100388
4. Ahmad MN, Shao Z, Aslam RW et al (2022) Landslide hazard, susceptibility and risk assessment (HSRA) based on remote sensing and GIS data models: a case study of Muzaffarabad Pakistan. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 36:4041–4056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02245-8
5. Ahmadi MM, Mahdavirad H, Bakhtiari B (2017) Multi-criteria analysis of site selection for groundwater recharge with treated municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 76:909–919. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.273