Abstract
AbstractThe wastewater treatment processes are associated with the emission of microbial aerosols, including enteropathogenic bacteria. Their presence in this work environment poses a real threat to the health of employees, both through the possibility of direct inhalation of the contaminated air and indirectly through the pollution of all types of surfaces with such bioaerosol particles. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of enteropathogenic bacteria in the air, on surfaces, and in wastewater samples collected in four wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The effectiveness of conventional culture-biochemical, as well as spectrometric and molecular methods for the rapid detection of enteropathogenic bacteria at workstations related to particular stages of wastewater processing, was also evaluated. Bioaerosol, surface swab, and influent and effluent samples were collected from wastewater plants employing mechanical–biological treatment technologies. The air samples were collected using MAS-100 NT impactor placed at a height of 1.5 m above the floor or ground, simulating aspiration from the human breathing zone. Surface samples were collected with sterile swabs from different surfaces (valves, handles, handrails, and coveyor belts) at workplaces. The raw influent and treated effluent wastewater samples were aseptically collected using sterile bottles. The identification of bacterial entheropathogens was simultaneously conducted using a culture-based method supplemented with biochemical (API) tests, mass-spectrometry (MALDI TOF MS), and molecular (multiplex real-time PCR) methods. This study confirmed the common presence of bacterial pathogens (including enteropathogenic and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., and Yersinia enterocolitica) in all air, surface, and wastewater samples at studied workplaces. Higher concentrations of enteropathogenic bacteria were observed in the air and on surfaces at workplaces where treatment processes were not hermetized. The results of this study underline that identification of enteropathogenic bacteria in WWTPs is of great importance for the correct risk assessment at workplaces. From the analytical point of view, the control of enteropathogenic bacterial air and surface pollution using rapid multiplex-PCR method should be routinely performed as a part of hygienic quality assessment in WWTPs.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education /National Centre for Research and Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Albatanony MA, El-Shafie MK (2011) Work-related health effects among wastewater treatment plants workers. Int J Occup Environ Med 2(4):237–244
2. Alsved M, Bourouiba L, Duchaine C, Löndahl J, Marr LC, Parker ST, Prussin AJ II, Thomas RJ (2020) Natural sources and experimental generation of bioaerosols: challenges and perspectives. Aerosol Sci Technol 54(5):547–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1682509
3. Alvarez AJ, Buttner MP, Stetzenbach LD (1995) PCR for bioaerosol monitoring: sensitivity and environmental interference. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(10):3639–3644. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.10.3639-3644.1995
4. Anastasi EM, Matthews B, Stratton HM, Katouli M (2012) Pathogenic Escherichia coli found in sewage treatment plants and environmental waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(16):5536–5541. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00657-12
5. APHA (2001) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC