Abstract
AbstractGlobal energy consumption is projected to grow by nearly 50% as of 2018, reaching a peak of 910.7 quadrillion BTU in 2050. The industrial sector accounts for the largest share of the energy consumed, making energy awareness on the shop floors imperative for promoting industrial sustainable development. Considering a growing awareness of the importance of sustainability, production planning and control require the incorporation of time-of-use electricity pricing models into scheduling problems for well-informed energy-saving decisions. Besides, modern manufacturing emphasizes the role of human factors in production processes. This study proposes a new approach for optimizing the hybrid flow-shop scheduling problems (HFSP) considering time-of-use electricity pricing, workers’ flexibility, and sequence-dependent setup time (SDST). Novelties of this study are twofold: to extend a new mathematical formulation and to develop an improved multi-objective optimization algorithm. Extensive numerical experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of the developed solution method, the adjusted multi-objective genetic algorithm (AMOGA), comparing it with the state-of-the-art, i.e., strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2), and Pareto envelop-based selection algorithm (PESA2). It is shown that AMOGA performs better than the benchmarks considering the mean ideal distance, inverted generational distance, diversification, and quality metrics, providing more versatile and better solutions for production and energy efficiency.
Funder
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Pollution,Environmental Chemistry,General Medicine
Reference45 articles.
1. Adler L, Fraiman N, Kobacker E et al (1993) BPSS: a scheduling support system for the packaging industry. Oper Res 41:641–648. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.41.4.641
2. Chen L, Bostel N, Dejax P et al (2007) A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal. Eur J Oper Res 181:40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.033
3. Cheng C-Y, Lin S-W, Pourhejazy P et al (2020) Greedy-based non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III for optimizing single-machine scheduling problem with interfering jobs. IEEE Access 8:142543–142556. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014134
4. CoelloCoello CA, Reyes Sierra M (2004) A study of the parallelization of a coevolutionary multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. In: Monroy R, Arroyo-Figueroa G, Sucar LE, Sossa H (eds) MICAI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 688–697
5. Corne DW, Jerram NR, Knowles JD, Oates MJ (2001) PESA-II: region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO'01). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, pp 283–290
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献