Abstract
Abstract
This study explores the implications of plastic waste and recycling management on recyclates for manufacturing clean-energy harvesting devices. The focus is on a comparative analysis of using recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) production, in two densely populated Asian countries of large economies, namely Singapore and India. Of the total 930,000 tonnes of plastic waste generated in Singapore in 2019, only 4% were recycled and the rest were incinerated. In comparison, India yielded 8.6 million tonnes of plastic waste and 70% were recycled. Both countries have strict recycling goals and have instituted different waste and recycling management regulations. The findings show that the waste policies and legislations, responsibilities and heterogeneity in collection systems and infrastructure of the respective country are the pivotal attributes to successful recycling. Challenges to recycle plastic include segregation, adulterants and macromolecular structure degradation which could influence the recyclate properties and pose challenges for manufacturing products. A model was developed to evaluate the economic value and mechanical potential of PET recyclate. The model predicted a 30% loss of material performance and a 65% loss of economic value after the first recycling cycle. The economic value depreciates to zero with decreasing mechanical performance of plastic after multiple recycling cycles. For understanding how TENG technology could be incorporated into the circular economy, a model has estimated about 20 million and 7300 billion pieces of aerogel mats can be manufactured from the PET bottles disposed in Singapore and India, respectively which were sufficient to produce small-scale TENG devices for all peoples in both countries.
Funder
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI): Research England
Newcastle University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Pollution,Environmental Chemistry,General Medicine
Reference145 articles.
1. Ahamed Kameel NI, Wan Daud WMA, Abdul Patah MF, Mohd Zulkifli NW (2022) Influence of reaction parameters on thermal liquefaction of plastic wastes into oil: a review. Energy Convers Manag X 14:100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100196
2. Alvarado Chacon F, Brouwer MT, Thoden van Velzen EU (2020) Effect of recycled content and rPET quality on the properties of PET bottles, part I: optical and mechanical properties. Packag Technol Sci 33:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2490
3. Antelava A, Jablonska N, Constantinou A et al (2021) Energy potential of plastic waste valorization: a short comparative assessment of pyrolysis versus gasification. Energy Fuels 35:3558–3571. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04017
4. Arwa Mahdawi (2020) More plastic will never be recycled - and the manufacturers couldn’t care less. In: Guard. News Media Ltd. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/15/most-plastic-will-never-be-recycled-and-the-manufacturers-couldnt-care-less
5. Ayilara MS, Olanrewaju OS, Babalola OO, Odeyemi O (2020) Waste management through composting: challenges and potentials. Sustain 12:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114456
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献