Abstract
AbstractPassive sampling is a crucial method for evaluating concentrations of hydrophilic organic compounds in the aquatic environment, but it is insufficiently understood to what extent passive samplers capture the intermittent emissions that frequently occur for this group of compounds. In the present study, silicone sheets and styrene-divinyl benzene-reversed phase sulfonated extraction disks with and without a polyethersulfone membrane were exposed under semi-field conditions in a 31 m3 flume at three different flow velocities. Natural processes and spiking/dilution measures caused aqueous concentrations to vary strongly with time. The data were analyzed using two analytical models that account for these time-variable concentrations: a sampling rate model and a diffusion model. The diffusion model generally gave a better fit of the data than the sampling rate model, but the difference in residual errors was quite small (median errors of 19 vs. 25% for silicone and 22 vs. 25% for SDB-RPS samplers). The sampling rate model was therefore adequate enough to evaluate the time-integrative capabilities of the samplers. Sampler performance was best for SDB-RPS samplers with a polyethersulfone membrane, despite the occurrence of lag times for some compounds (0.1 to 0.4 days). Sampling rates for this design also spanned a narrower range (80 to 110 mL/day) than SDB-RPS samplers without a membrane (100 to 660 mL/day). The effect of biofouling was similar for all compounds and was consistent with a biofouling layer thickness of 150 µm.
Funder
German Environment Agency
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Becker B, Claus E, Möhlenkamp C, Bachtin J, Paschke A, Schäfer S (2020) Anwendung von Passivsammlern in Überwachungsprogrammen gemäß WRRL und MSRL - Identifizierung von Kontaminationsschwerpunkten, Referenzstandorten und neuen Schadstoffen (AnPassa). (No. UBA Texte 110/2020). Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/anwendung-von-passivsammlern-in
2. Bernard M, Boutry S, Tapie N, Budzinski H, Mazzella N (2018) Lab-scale investigation of the ability of polar organic chemical integrative sampler to catch short pesticide contamination peaks. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3391-2
3. Billo EJ (2001) Non-linear regression using the solver. In: Billo EJ (ed) Excel for chemists: a comprehensive guide. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, pp 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471220582.ch12
4. Booij K (2021) Passive sampler exchange kinetics in large and small water volumes under mixed rate control by sorbent and water boundary layer. Environ Toxicol Chem 40:1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4989
5. Booij K, Chen S (2018) Review of atrazine sampling by polar organic chemical integrative samplers and Chemcatcher. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:1786–1798. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4160