Author:
Mannina Giorgio,Cosenza Alida,Di Trapani Daniele,Mofatto Paulo Marcelo Bosco
Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents a study on reducing sewage sludge by an oxic-settling-anaerobic (OSA) pilot plant compared to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process in view of resource recovery and moving towards plant carbon neutrality. The OSA plant was supplied with real wastewater and the anaerobic reactor was operated under two hydraulic retention times (HRT) (4 and 6 h). Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were monitored for the first time to determine the OSA process’s production mechanism. The results highlighted that under the lowest HRT (4 h), the removal efficiencies of COD and PO4−P, increased from 75 to 89% and from 39 to 50% for CAS and OSA configurations, respectively. The observed yield coefficient was reduced from 0.58 gTSS gCOD−1 (CAS period) to 0.31 gTSS gCOD−1 (OSA period). A remarkable deterioration of nitrification efficiency under OSA configuration was obtained from 79% (CAS) to 27% (OSA with HRT of 6 h). The huge deterioration of nitrification significantly affected the GHG emissions, with the N2O-N fraction increasing from 1% (CAS) to 1.55% (OSA 4 h HRT) and 3.54% (OSA 6 h HRT) of the overall effluent nitrogen, thus suggesting a relevant environmental implication due to the high global warming potential (GWP) of N2O.
Graphical abstract
Funder
Università degli Studi di Palermo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edition edited by E. W. Rice, R. B. Baird, A. D. Eaton and L. S. Clesceri. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington, D.C.
2. Cantekin C, Taybuga ES, Yagci N, Orhon D (2019) Potential for simultaneous nitrogen removal and sludge reduction of the oxic-settling-anaerobic process operated as a dual fed sequencing batch reactor. J Environ Manag 247:394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.086
3. Capodici M, Fabio Corsino S, Di Pippo F, Di Trapani D, Torregrossa M (2016) An innovative respirometric method to assess the autotrophic active fraction: application to an alternate oxic-anoxic MBR pilot plant. Chem Eng J 300:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.134
4. Chen GH, An KJ, Saby S, Brois E, Djafer M (2003) Possible cause of excess sludge reduction in an oxic-settling-anaerobic activated sludge process (OSA process). Water Res 37(16):3855–3866. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00331-2
5. Chudoba P, Morel A, Capdeville B (1992) The case of both energetic uncoupling and metabolic selection of microorganisms in the OSA activated sludge system. Environ Technol 13(8):761–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593339209385207