Abstract
AbstractMicroplastics are the new emerging pollutants ubiquitously detectable in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Fate and behavior, as well as ecotoxicity, are of increasing environmental concern, particularly in sediments and soils as natural sinks. For a global environmental risk assessment, reliable and easy to apply analytical methods are mandatory to obtain comparable data. This is based on the isolation of microplastics out of the solid sample matrices prior to instrumental detection. Thus, this study provides an easy to apply approach for density separation. The technique emerged from a comparative study using different salt solutions to isolate conventional, and for the first time biodegradable, microplastics from different solid sample matrices, i.e., sand, artificial soil, and compost. Four solutions (water, sodium chloride, sodium hexametaphosphate, and sodium bromide) of different densities were applied followed by oxidizing digestion. Finally, the impact of the procedures on size and surface properties of microplastics was tested. Dependent on the sample matrix, the highest recovery rates of 87.3–100.3% for conventional polymers, and 38.2–78.2% for biodegradable polymers, were determined with sodium bromide. It could be shown that the type of solid sample matrix influences the recovery rates and has to be considered when choosing a sample preparation technique.
Graphical abstract
Funder
Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Bundesforschungsinstitut für Ländliche Räume, Wald und Fischerei
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Pollution,Environmental Chemistry,General Medicine
Reference57 articles.
1. Barceló D, Picó Y (2019) Microplastics in the global aquatic environment: analysis effects, remediation and policy solutions. J Environ Chem Eng 7:103421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103421
2. Bläsing M, Amelung W (2018) Plastics in soil: analytical methods and possible sources. Sci Total Environ 612:422–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.086
3. Boots B, Russell CW, Green DS (2019) Effects of microplastics in soil ecosystems: above and below ground. Environ Sci Technol 53:11496–11506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304
4. Braun U, Jekel M, Gerdts G, et al. (2018) Mikroplastik-Analytik: Probenahme, Probenaufbereitung und Detektionsverfahren: Diskussionspapier im Rahmen des Forschungsschwerpunktes Plastik in der Umwelt. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
5. Büks F, Kaupenjohann M (2020) Global concentrations of microplastic in soils a review. SOIL 6:649–662. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2020-50
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献