Author:
Gao Jay,Li Xi-lai,Brierley Gary,Cheung Alan,Yang Yuan-wu
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper a geomorphic-centered system was proposed for classifying the wetlands on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in western China, where the flora comprises primarily grasses. Although the geomorphic properties (e.g., elevation and morphology) of wetlands form the primary criteria of classification, this system also takes hydrological processes into implicit consideration. It represents an improvement over the hydrogeomorphic perspective as the relative importance of the two components (wetness and landform) of wetlands is clearly differentiated. This geomorphic-centered perspective yields insights into the hydrogeomorphic dynamics of plateau wetlands while indicates their vulnerability to change and degradation indirectly. According to this geomorphic-centered perspective, all plateau wetlands fall into one of the seven types of alpine, piedmont, valley, terrace, floodplain, lacustrine, and riverine in three elevational categories of upland, midland, and lowland. Upland (alpine and piedmont) wetlands with the steepest topography are the most sensitive to change whereas midland (floodplain, terrace and valley) wetlands are less vulnerable to degradation owing to a high water reserve except terrace wetlands. They have a dry surface caused by infrequent hydrological replenishment owing to their higher elevation than the channel. Low lying (lacustrine and riverine) wetlands are the most resilient. The geomorphic-centered perspective developed in this paper provides a framework for improving recognition and management of wetlands on the Plateau. Resilient wetlands can be grazed more intensively without the risk of degradation. Fragile and vulnerable wetlands require careful management to avoid degradation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Earth-Surface Processes,Geology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference31 articles.
1. Bedford BL, and Preston EM (1988) Developing the scientific basis for assessing cumulative effects of wetland loss and degradation on landscape functions: Status, perspectives, and prospects. Environmental Management 12(5): 751–771. DOI: 10.1007/BF01867550
2. Brinson MM (1993) A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. WRP-DE-4. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
3. Brooks RP, Brinson MM, Havens KJ, et al. (2011) Proposed hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands of the Mid Atlantic Region, USA. Wetlands 31(2): 207–219. DOI: 10.1007/s13157-011-0158-7
4. Clausen JC, Ortega IM, Glaude CM, et al. (2006) Classification of wetlands in a Patagonian National Park, Chile. Wetlands 26: 217–229. DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[217:COWIAP] 2.0.CO;2
5. Costa LT, Farinha JC, Hecker N, et al. (1996) Mediterranean Wetland Inventory: A Reference Manual. MedWet / Instituto da Conservacão da Natureza / Wetlands International Publication, Volume I.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献