Moving parts: the natural alliance between dynamical and mechanistic modeling approaches-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Moving parts: the natural alliance between dynamical and mechanistic modeling approaches

Published:2015-08-28 Issue:6 Volume:30 Page:757-786
ISSN:0169-3867
Container-title:Biology & Philosophy
language:en
Short-container-title:Biol Philos

Author:

Kaplan David Michael

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10539-015-9499-6.pdf

Reference94 articles.

1. Abraham R, Shaw CD (1992) Dynamics: the geometry of behavior. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City

2. Abrahamsen A, Bechtel W (2006) Phenomena and mechanisms: putting the symbolic, connectionist, and dynamical systems debate in broader perspective. In Stainton R (ed) Contemporary debates in cognitive science. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

3. Ahrens MB, Li JM, Orger MB, Robson DN, Schier AF, Engert F, Portugues R (2012) Brain-wide neuronal dynamics during motor adaptation in zebrafish. Nature 485(7399):471–477

4. Amit DJ (1992) Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

5. Bechtel W (1998a) Dynamicists versus computationalists: whither mechanists? Behav Brain Sci 21(05):629

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Dynamicist Landscape;Topics in Cognitive Science;2023-10-07

2. Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science;Minds and Machines;2023-01-16

3. 3e Cognition and Existing Enactive Frameworks;Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology;2023

4. Cognitive extra-mathematical explanations;Synthese;2022-04

5. An explanatory taste for mechanisms;Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences;2022-02-18