Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, I plan to show that the use of a specific population concept—Millstein’s Causal Interactionist Population Concept (CIPC)—has interesting and counter-intuitive ramifications for discussions of the reality of biological race in human beings. These peculiar ramifications apply to human beings writ large and to individuals. While this in and of itself may not be problematic, I plan to show that the ramifications that follow from applying Millstein’s CIPC to human beings complicates specific biological racial realist accounts—naïve or otherwise. I conclude with the notion that even if biological races do exist—by fulfilling all of the criteria needed for Millstein’s population concept (which, given particular worries raised by Gannett (Synthese 177:363–385, 2010), and Winther and Kaplan (Theoria 60:54–80, 2013) may not)—the lower-bound limit for the scope of biological racial realism is at the level of populations, and as such they cannot say anything about whether or not individual organisms themselves have races.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference107 articles.
1. Adams M (1990) The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. Oxford University Press, New York
2. Alba R, Beck B, Sahin DB (2018) The rise of mixed parentage: a sociological and demographic phenomenon to be reckoned with. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 677(1):26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218757656
3. Allee W, Park O, Emerson AE, Park T, Schmidt KP (1967) Principles of animal ecology. W.B. Saunders Company
4. Allendorf FW, Luikart GH, Aitken SN (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex
5. Andreasen RO (1998) A new perspective on the race debate. Br J Philos Sci 49(2):199–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/49.2.199