What’s wrong with the modern evolutionary synthesis? A critical reply to Welch (2017)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What’s wrong with the modern evolutionary synthesis? A critical reply to Welch (2017)

Published:2018-05-30 Issue:3-4 Volume:33 Page:
ISSN:0169-3867
Container-title:Biology & Philosophy
language:en
Short-container-title:Biol Philos

Author:

Tanghe Koen B.^ORCID,De Tiège Alexis,Pauwels Lieven,Blancke Stefaan,Braeckman Johan

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-018-9633-3/fulltext.html

Reference121 articles.

1. Amundson R (2005) The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: roots of evo-devo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

2. Antonovics J (1987) The evolutionary dys-synthesis. Am Nat 129:321–331

3. Boto L (2010) Horizontal gene transfer in evolution: facts and challenges. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277(1683):819–827

4. Bowler P (1983) The eclipse of Darwinism: anti-Darwinian evolution theories in the decades around 1900. John Hopkins University, Baltimore

5. Bowler P (1996) Life’s splendid drama: evolutionary biology and the reconstruction of life’s ancestry, 1860–1940. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Critique of Current Philosophy of Biology;History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences;2024

2. Thomas S. Kuhn: key to a better understanding of the extended evolutionary synthesis;Theory in Biosciences;2023-11-17

3. On the evolution of epigenetics via exaptation: A developmental systems perspective;Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences;2023-09-26

4. Incommensurability in Evolutionary Biology: The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis Controversy;Interdisciplinary Evolution Research;2023

5. From the Modern Synthesis to the Other (Extended, Super, Postmodern…) Syntheses;Understanding Evolution in Darwin's "Origin";2023