1. Pithers WD, Laws DR. Phallometric assessment. In: Schwartz BK, Cellini HR, editors. The sex offender: corrections, treatment and legal practice. Kingston: Civic Research Institute, Inc; 1995. p. 12.1–12.18.
2. Freund K. Diagnostika homosexuality u muzu. Cs Psychiatrica. 1957;53:382–93.
3. Freund K. A laboratory method for diagnosing predominance of homo- or hetero-erotic interest in the male. Behav Res Ther. 1963;12:355–9.
4. Freund K. Erotic preference in pedophilia. Behav Res Ther. 1967;5:339–48.
5. Fedoroff JP, Kuban M, Bradford JM. Laboratory measurement of penile response in the assessment of sexual interests. In: Saleh F, Grudzinskas A, Bradford J, Brodsky, editors. Sex offenders: identification, risk assessment, treatment and legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 89–100. This chapter provides an overview of the history of PPG assessment, a review of commonly used techniques, and implications of its use in a forensic setting. Specific topics examined include measurement techniques, stimulus sets, testing arousal to coercion and assessment of pedophiles, faking and repression of arousal and legal implications.