Abstract
AbstractLow-Acy-Matching asks to find a maximal matching M in a given graph G of minimum cardinality such that the set of M-saturated vertices induces an acyclic subgraph in G. The decision version of Low-Acy-Matching is known to be $${\textsf{NP}}$$
NP
-complete. In this paper, we strengthen this result by proving that the decision version of Low-Acy-Matching remains $${\textsf{NP}}$$
NP
-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree 6 and planar perfect elimination bipartite graphs. We also show the hardness difference between Low-Acy-Matching and Max-Acy-Matching. Furthermore, we prove that, even for bipartite graphs, Low-Acy-Matching cannot be approximated within a ratio of $$n^{1-\epsilon }$$
n
1
-
ϵ
for any $$\epsilon >0$$
ϵ
>
0
unless $${\textsf{P}}={\textsf{NP}}$$
P
=
NP
. Finally, we establish that Low-Acy-Matching exhibits $$\textsf{APX}$$
APX
-hardness when restricted to 4-regular graphs.
Funder
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Ausiello G, Crescenzi P, Gambosi G, Kann V, Spaccamela AM, Protasi M (2012) Complexity and approximation: combinatorial optimization problems and their approximability properties. Springer, New York
2. Bazgan C, Brankovic L, Casel K, Fernau H, Jansen K, Klein K, Lampis M, Liedloff M, Monnot J, Paschos VT (2018) The many facets of upper domination. Theoret Comput Sci 717:2–25
3. Boria N, Croce FD, Paschos VT (2015) On the max min vertex cover problem. Discret Appl Math 196:62–71
4. Cameron K (1989) Induced matchings. Discret Appl Math 24:97–102
5. Chaudhary J, Panda BS (2021) On the complexity of minimum maximal uniquely restricted matching. Theoret Comput Sci 882:15–28