Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study is to analyse inter-firm corruption and to ascertain whether the proximity of firms engaged in corruption is a significant factor. We draw on transaction cost theory to explore two forms of corrupt exchange (negotiated vs. productive) and the role of proximity in reducing transaction costs. We obtained original data from the judgements of the Italian Court of Cassation and clustered homogeneous proximities. We then used separate binomial logistic regressions to show how the relation between transaction properties, the consequences for transaction costs and forms of corrupt exchange lead to different outcomes for each subgroup of proximities. The results show that technological and geographical proximity are beneficial to both forms of exchange, leading to a reduction in exchange costs, in much the same way as legal activities. However, unlike legal exchanges, corrupt and in particular productive exchanges do not appear to benefit from social proximity.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Salerno
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference55 articles.
1. Adjei, E. K., Eriksson, R. H., & Lindgren, U. (2016). Social proximity and firm performance: The importance of family member ties in workplaces. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1189354
2. Alfano, G., & Troisi, R. (2019). Corrupt political leaders and the failures of the institutional checks. In A. Mesquita, & P. Silva, (Eds.) ECMLG 2019 15th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (1st ed., pp. 17–26). Academic Conferences and Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.34190/MLG.19.030
3. Anderson, E., & Jap, S. D. (2005). The dark side of close relationships: The very factors that make partnerships with customers or suppliers beneficial can leave those relationships vulnerable to deterioration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 75–83.
4. Argandoña, A. (2003). Private-to-private corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026266219609
5. Barasa, L. (2018). Corruption, transaction costs, and innovation in Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 10(7), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2018.1519061
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献