Abstract
AbstractThe question of why some firms grow faster than others is of high theoretical and practical importance. Beyond a wealth of studies based on stochastic models, firm growth has mostly been explained by looking at the structural characteristics of firms, sectors, and countries. The role of managers’ characteristics in fostering firms’ growth has been explored much less. In this study, we adopt one key characteristic of managers, the age of the chief executive officer (CEO) and examine its relationship with the firm’s organic growth. Using data from a large sample of European manufacturing firms, we find that firms managed by young CEOs grow faster in terms of sales and assets, but not in terms of profitability. These results hold with the inclusion of a large vector of firm and CEO characteristics, and a battery of robustness checks, including issues related to the time horizon and appointment of CEOs, the educational attainment of younger cohorts of managers, and endogeneity. We hypothesize that young CEOs are incentivized to boost firm growth to signal their talent in the managerial market and to secure a longer stream of future compensation benefits. To the extent that firm growth does not translate into higher profitability, this may create an agency problem, due to the divergence of this corporate strategy from shareholders’ targets. In line with this hypothesis, we find that a more concentrated ownership that allows for more effective monitoring moderates the relationship between CEO age and firm growth.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference95 articles.
1. Aghion, P., & Stein, J. C. (2008). Growth versus margins: Destabilizing consequences of giving the stock market what it wants. The Journal of Finance, LXIII(3), 1025–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01351.x.
2. Ahuja, K., Segel, L. H., & Perrey, J. (2017). Mastering three strategies of organic growth. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2–8.
3. Altomonte, C., Aquilante, T., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2012). The triggers of competitiveness: The EFIGE Cross-Country Report. Bruegel Blueprint Series XVII.
4. Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 605–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003575.
5. Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.103.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献