Entrepreneurial governance and the nature of the entrepreneurial firm

Author:

Grandori AnnaORCID

Abstract

AbstractEveryone uses—but no one defines—the term “entrepreneurial firm.” Nobel laureate Oliver Williamson described the entrepreneurial firm as “a special challenge” to the theory of the firm. Organization scholars struggle with the “evergreen problem” of whether “entrepreneurial organizations are distinct from established organizations.” Building on a rarely used distinction in early transaction cost economics between “capitalist,” “entrepreneurial,” and “collective” enterprises, an entrepreneurial governance mode is here dimensionalized and distinguished from other modes of governing an enterprise. The critical dimension is the allocation of property rights, whereby entrepreneurial governance can be characterized as a hybrid between capital governance and labor governance. This notion is then used to derive the conditions that other relevant legal and organizational traits of the entrepreneurial firm should satisfy to be compatible with this hybrid character. The conclusions indicate three main trails for a new research agenda in a structural view of entrepreneurship: new organizational dimensions and forms; the design of ownership structures; and entrepreneurship and law.

Funder

Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference63 articles.

1. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). The circular organization: An update. Academy of Management Perspectives, 3(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1989.4277144

2. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? Journal of Management, 31(5), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279486

3. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). The entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00721.x

4. Armour, J., Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2009). The essential elements of corporate law. ECGI Law Working Paper N.134/2009. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1436551. Accessed 24 Jan 2024

5. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In J. Kenneth (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors (pp. 219–236). Princeton University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3