The global technology frontier: productivity growth and the relevance of Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship

Author:

Lafuente EstebanORCID,Acs Zoltan J.,Sanders Mark,Szerb László

Abstract

AbstractWe evaluate how country-level entrepreneurship—measured via the national system of entrepreneurship—triggers total factor productivity (TFP) by increasing the effects of Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship. Using a database for 45 developed and developing countries during 2002–2013, we employ non-parametric techniques to build a world technology frontier and compute TFP estimates. The results of the common factor models reveal that the national system of entrepreneurship is a relevant conduit of TFP, and that this effect is heterogeneous across countries. Policies supporting Kirznerian entrepreneurship—e.g., increased business formation rates—may promote the creation of low value-adding businesses which is not associated with higher TFP rates. Policy interventions targeting Schumpeterian entrepreneurship objectives—e.g., innovative entrepreneurship and the development of new technologies—are conducive to technical change by promoting upward shifts in the countries’ production function and, consequently, productivity growth.

Funder

Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness

European Union through the Horizon 2020 project? Financial and Institutional Reforms to build an Entrepreneurial Society?

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference77 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed technical change. Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 781–809.

2. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166.

3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf, Handbook of Economic Growth (pp. 385–472). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

4. Acemoglu, D., & Zilibotti, F. (2001). Productivity differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 563–606.

5. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms—an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78, 678–690.

Cited by 75 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The impact of the context on the university students’ start-up activities;Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management;2024-09-06

2. Does stock market liberalization promote entrepreneurship?;Economic Analysis and Policy;2024-09

3. Entrepreneurship Ecosystems, Performance, Policy Formulation;Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage;2024-07-26

4. The role of macro institutional factors in determining types of entrepreneurial start-ups: a longitudinal panel study;European Business Review;2024-07-11

5. National and Regional Economic Growth and Development Fostered by Entrepreneurship Ecosystems;Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development;2024-06-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3