Author:
Eskandariun H.,Noorollahi Y.,Ghobadian B.,Zahedi S.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Bhattacharya, S. (2021). Central composite design for response surface methodology and its application in pharmacy. Response surface methodology in engineering science-IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95835.
2. Bouvant, M., Betancour, J., Velásquez, L., Rubio-Clemente, A., & Chica, E. (2021). Design optimization of an Archimedes screw turbine for hydrokinetic applications using the response surface methodology. Renewable Energy, 172, 941–954.
3. Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 1–38. Discussion: 3845.
4. Dellinger, G., Simmons, S., Lubitz, W. D., Garambois, P., & Dellinger, N. (2019). Effect of slope and number of blades on Archimedes screw generator power output. Renewable Energy, 136, 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.060
5. Deng, Z., Carlson, T. J., Double, D. D., & Ploskey, G. R. (2011). Fish passage assessment of an advanced hydropower turbine and conventional turbine using blade-strike modeling. Energies, 4, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010057