Mineral Prospectivity Mapping Based on Spatial Feature Classification with Geological Map Knowledge Graph Embedding: Case Study of Gold Ore Prediction at Wulonggou, Qinghai Province (Western China)
-
Published:2024-07-24
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1520-7439
-
Container-title:Natural Resources Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Resour Res
Author:
Yan Qun, Zhao Juan, Xue LinfuORCID, Wei Liqiong, Ji Mingjia, Ran Xiangjin, Dai Junhao
Abstract
AbstractProspectivity mapping based on deep learning typically requires substantial amounts of geological feature information from known mineral deposits. Due to the limited spatial distribution of ore deposits, the training of predictive models is often hampered by insufficient positive samples. Meanwhile, data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping often overlooks domain knowledge and expert experience, leading to poor interpretability of predictive results. To address this problem, we employed the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for spatial feature classification to expand the number of positive samples. The approach integrated the embedding of geological map knowledge graphs with geological exploration data to enhance the knowledge constraints of the prospecting model, which enabled the integration of knowledge with data. Considering the complex spatial structure of geological elements, a bi-branch utilizing the 1-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN1D) and graph convolutional network (GCN) was used to extract geological spatial features for model training and prediction. To validate the effectiveness of the method, a gold mineralization prediction study was conducted in the Wulonggou area (Qinghai province, western China). The results indicate that, when the number of GMM spatial feature classifications was 17, the positive-to-negative sample ratio was optimal, and the embedding of the knowledge graph controlled the prediction area distribution effectively, which demonstrated strong consistency between the prospecting area and the known mineral deposits. Compared with the predictions by CNN1D, the fused prediction model of CNN1D and GCN yielded higher accuracy. Our model identified 11 classes of mineralization potential areas and provides geological interpretations for different prediction categories.
Funder
Cooperation Program of Qinghai Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Achlioptas, D. (2003). Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 66(4), 671–687. 2. Agterberg, F. P. (1974). Automatic contouring of geological maps to detect target areas for mineral exploration. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 6(4), 373–395. 3. Chen, H., Sultan, S. F., Tian, Y., Chen, M., & Skiena, S. (2019). Fast and accurate network embeddings via very sparse random projection. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3357879 4. Chen, B. L., Wang, Y., Han, Y., & Chen, J. L. (2019b). Metallogenic age of Yanjingou gold deposit in Wulonggou gold ore field, eastern Kunlun Mountains. Mineral Deposits, 38(03), 541–556. (in Chinese). 5. Chen, H., Deng, S., Zhang, W., Xu, Z., Li, J., & Kharlamov, E. (2021a). Neural symbolic reasoning with knowledge graphs: Knowledge extraction, relational reasoning, and inconsistency checking. Fundamental Research, 1(5), 565–573.
|
|