Abstract
AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted anatomy education as it ceased face-to-face anatomy teaching sessions and laboratory practicals. In the past 2 years, a growing body of literature has been dedicated to the adaptations made in the teaching of anatomy predominantly by medical schools who employ cadaveric dissection and prosection-based practicals to teach anatomy. Despite this, there is dearth of evidence in terms of the challenges that medical schools who do not use cadaveric dissection or prosected specimens to teach anatomy faced as well as the adaptations they made in response to the pandemic.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference24 articles.
1. Torres K, Torres A, Pietrzyk Ł, Lisiecka J, Błoński M, Bącik-Donica M, et al. Simulation techniques in the anatomy curriculum: review of literature. Folia Morphol. 2014;73:1–6.
2. Fowler T. COVID-19 & university stakeholders: a faculty perspective [Internet]. The Aquila Digital Community. 2021. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1950. Accessed 8 Apr 2022.
3. Attardi S, Harmon D, Barremkala M, Bentley D, Brown K, Dennis J, et al. An analysis of anatomy education before and during COVID-19: August–December 2020. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;15:5–26.
4. Franchi T. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on current anatomy education and future careers: a student’s perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13:312–5.
5. Patera E. Is there a correlation between how medical students study and prepare for anatomy and the reasons why they find anatomy difficult? Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14:853–5.