Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) has acknowledged the importance of pregnancy options counseling by listing it as a “shows how” skill for all undergraduate medical students. Unfortunately, there is no standard curriculum utilized to teach medical students pregnancy options counseling or to assess skill sustainability over time.
Objectives
To review and summarize the literature on pregnancy options counseling in undergraduate medical education.
Methods
We performed a structured literature review searching Google Scholar, PubMed, and EMBASE for articles between 2000 and February 2020. Inclusion criteria were English language studies of M. D. and D.O. programs in North America with a discussion of pregnancy options counseling as it relates to medical student education.
Results
There is a small but growing body of literature on pregnancy options counseling in medical student education. The common themes across the 17 papers reviewed include the status of pregnancy options counseling in undergraduate medical education, barriers to teaching options counseling, the timing of education, utilization of the options counseling Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), learner challenges, and novel strategies for implementing education in options counseling and subsequent learning outcomes.
Conclusions
There is no standardized pregnancy options counseling curriculum in undergraduate medical education (UME). The landscape in which this important skill is being taught is one of random, insufficient, and uncoordinated curricular interventions. This is the only review on this subject, making it a unique summary on pregnancy options counseling in UME.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference27 articles.
1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2014;374(9):843–52. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
2. Perrucci AC. Decision assessment and counseling in abortion care: philosophy and practice. S.l.: Rowman & Littlefield; 2012. p. 173–94.
3. Pace L, Sandahl Y, Backus L, Silveira M, Steinauer J. Medical Students for Choice’s Reproductive Health Externships: impact on medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and intention to provide abortions. Contraception. 2008;78:31–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.008.
4. Yudkowsky R, Tumuluru S, Casey P, Herlich N, Ledonne C. A patient safety approach to setting pass/fail standards for basic procedural skills checklists. Simul Healthc. 2014;9:277–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000044.
5. “Reproductive and Sexual Coercion. Committee Opinion #554.” ACOG, Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, Feb. 2013, www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2013/02/reproductive-and-sexual-coercion.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献