Author:
Wilson Adam B.,Grichanik Mark,Williams James M.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference20 articles.
1. Inuwa IM, Taranikanti V, Al-Rawahy M, Habbal O. Anatomy practical examinations: how does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format? Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(1):27–32.
2. Karami M, Heussen N, Schmitz-Rode T, Baumann M. Advantages and disadvantages of electronic assessments in biomedical education. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7-12, 2009, Munich, Germany. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.
3. Krippendorf BB, Bolender DL, Kolesari GL. Computerized grading of anatomy laboratory practical examinations. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(5):220–3.
4. Meyer AJ, Innes SI, Stomski NJ, Armson AJ. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;9(2):111–20.
5. Casey M. Computer-assisted grading of gross anatomy practical. Clin Anat. 2001;14(1):69.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献