Choosing between choice models of ethics: Rawlsian equality, utilitarianism, and the concept of persons-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Choosing between choice models of ethics: Rawlsian equality, utilitarianism, and the concept of persons

Published:1987-05 Issue:3 Volume:22 Page:209-224
ISSN:0040-5833
Container-title:Theory and Decision
language:en
Short-container-title:Theor Decis

Author:

Ball Stephen W.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Science Applications,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Social Sciences,Applied Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Decision Sciences

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00134085.pdf

Reference29 articles.

1. Arrow, K. J.: 1973, ?Some ordinalist-utilitarian notes on Rawls' theory of justice?, Journal of Philosophy 70, 245?63.

2. Ball, S. W.: 1986, ?Economic equality: Rawls versus utilitarianism?, Economics and Philosophy 2, 125?44.

3. Bloom, A.: 1975, ?Justice: John Rawls vs. the tradition of political philosophy?, American Political Science Review 69, 648?62.

4. Brandt, R. B.: 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford Press.

5. Brandt, R. B.: 1983, ?Problems of contemporary utilitarianism: Real and alleged?, in Ethical Theory in the Last Quarter of the Twentieth Century, edited by N. Bowie, Hackett, pp. 81?105.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Allocating Scarce Medical Resources to the Overweight;The Journal of Clinical Ethics;2010-12-01

2. Preface;Inequality Reexamined;1995-09-14

3. Dedication;Inequality Reexamined;1995-09-14

4. Copyright Page;Inequality Reexamined;1995-09-14

5. Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate;Utilitas;1993-11