Abstract
AbstractThe global loss of marine ecosystem engineers has caused an unprecedented decline in biodiversity. Although wild shellfish habitats have been shown to support biodiverse ecosystems, little is known about how biodiversity is altered by restored shellfish habitats, particularly mussels. To explore the biodiversity response to restored mussel habitats we deposited mussels on the seafloor in 1.5 × 1.5 m plots across a gradient of benthic environments. To understand a holistic community response, this study looks at the response of three faunal classifications over 1 year: infauna, epifauna, and pelagic fauna, compared with adjacent control plots (no mussels). The restored mussel habitats recorded 42 times more demersal fish than control areas, while macroalgae and mobile benthic invertebrates had over a twofold increase in abundance. Overall, the addition of mussels to the seafloor resulted in a general reduction of infaunal abundance and biodiversity, but an increase in epifaunal and pelagic faunal abundances, specifically from those species that benefit from benthic habitat complexity and an increase in food availability. From a management perspective, we highlight location-specific differences to consider for future restoration efforts, including environmental conditions and potential observed factors such as nearby sources of species, particularly predators, and relevant demersal fish ranges. Ultimately, measuring biodiversity responses in small-scale studies will serve as a valuable guide for larger scale restoration efforts and this study recommends considerations to enhance biodiversity outcomes in restored mussel habitats.
Funder
Ministry for Primary Industries
University of Auckland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference80 articles.
1. Alder A, Jeffs A, Hillman JR (2021) Considering the use of subadult and juvenile mussels for mussel reef restoration. Restor Ecol 29:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13322
2. Alfaro AC, Jeffs AG, Creese RG (2004) Bottom-drifting algal/mussel spat associations along a sandy coastal region in northern New Zealand. Aquaculture 241:269–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.07.029
3. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x
4. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
5. Beck MW, Brumbaugh RD, Airoldi L, et al (2009) Shellfish reefs at risk: a global analysis of problems and solutions. Arlington, VA. https://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPractices/Marine/Documents/ShellfishReefsatRisk-06.18.09-Pages.pdf
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献