Integrative reflections on the new conservation science debate-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Integrative reflections on the new conservation science debate

Published:2015-02-05 Issue:6 Volume:24 Page:1549-1551
ISSN:0960-3115
Container-title:Biodiversity and Conservation
language:en
Short-container-title:Biodivers Conserv

Author:

Petriello Michael A.,Wallen Kenneth E.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-015-0874-z.pdf

Reference18 articles.

1. Cafaro P, Primack R (2014) Species extinction is a great moral wrong. Biol Conserv 170:1–2

2. Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly C, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A (2015) A Rosetta stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040

3. Doak DF, Bakker VJ, Goldstein BE, Hale B (2014) What is the future of conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 29:77–81

4. Fitzgerald LA, Stronza AL (2009) Applied biodiversity science: bridging ecology, culture, and governance for effective conservation. Interciencia 34:563–570

5. Kareiva P (2014) New conservation: setting the record straight and finding common ground. Conserv Biol 28:634–636

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The scope of empowerment for conservation and communities;Conservation Biology;2024-03-15

2. The Coexistence Potential of Different Wildlife Conservation Frameworks in a Historical Perspective;Frontiers in Conservation Science;2022-01-19

3. Social-ecological wellbeing of communities engaged in ecotourism: Perspectives from Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary, Bhutan;Journal of Sustainable Tourism;2021-04-24

4. Stakeholder discourses on urban mangrove conservation and management;Ocean & Coastal Management;2019-08

5. Conservation Biologists and the Representation of At-Risk Species: Navigating Ethical Tensions in an Evolving Discipline;Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics;2019-03-02