Skip to main content
Log in

The steppes demonstrate higher productivity but lower diversity in Inner Mongolia than Mongolia: driven by climate or land use?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The steppes on the Mongolian Plateau cover a large land area of Mongolia (MG) and Inner Mongolia of China (IM). They share similar biophysical conditions, but have experienced divergent land use systems over the past several decades. However, no systematic field study has been done across different climate-vegetation zones for a comparison of the patterns of these steppes subject to different land use systems. We performed a field survey on 65 sites along four climatic transects, two in MG and two in IM, across desert steppe, typical steppe and meadow steppe zones, and investigated plant species composition, diversity and productivity. We compared these vegetation features between two regions, and attributed their variation patterns to climate and human activities. The results showed that plant species or plant functional group composition were similar between the two regions. However, plant productivity was significantly higher, whereas plant diversity indices were lower, in IM than MG. Aridity is the primary factor driving the spatial variation in plant diversity and productivity of the steppes across the Mongolian Plateau, while land use also has profound effects. The contrast vegetation pattern between MG and IM may be related with their difference in overgrazing history and grassland management strategies. These results suggest that overgrazing induced decline in plant productivity and its recovery is faster than the species diversity loss and recovery. Our results indicate that land use policies are urgently needed to promote destocking for preventing biodiversity loss in Mongolia, and that practical measures need to be developed to facilitate the recovery of species diversity in Inner Mongolia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the members who participated in the data collection, especially Xinyu Zhang, Zijing Li, Jifei Xu, Bailing Miao, Lei Dong, Xuze Tong, Junbo Yang, Xudong Guo, Tongrui Zhang, Ying Zheng.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32261143732, U22A20559, 31160119) and the con (201503001, 2021ZD0011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FL and CL conceived the ideas and designed the research. Field investigation and data collection were performed by FYL, CL, LZ, LXW, WM, LW, TB, LC, IT, MC, and PJ. Data analysis and figures were performed by WM. The main manuscript was written by WM and FYL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Yonghong Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Riccardo Guarino.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 154 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, W., Li, F.Y., Liang, C. et al. The steppes demonstrate higher productivity but lower diversity in Inner Mongolia than Mongolia: driven by climate or land use?. Biodivers Conserv 33, 1827–1843 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02789-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02789-x

Keywords

Navigation