Author:
Stevens Bryan S.,Conway Courtney J.,Sawyer Kimberly A.,Kershek Lauren,Block Giselle,Hamilton Sandra,Kolstrom Rebecca
Abstract
AbstractMonitoring provides the foundation for evaluating recovery of endangered species, yet many species lack monitoring programs designed to integrate a species’ unique attributes, specific monitoring objectives, and principles of statistical sampling theory. We developed a framework for monitoring and assessment of endangered light-footed Ridgway’s rails (Rallus obsoletus levipes) across their U.S. range, relative to multi-scale recovery goals. We created spatially explicit sample units and a sampling frame covering all potential habitat to facilitate range-wide probability sampling, and also built a model of the call-broadcast process commonly used to survey marsh birds that included heterogeneity in availability for detection and conditional detectability for each bird during each survey. We used the model to simulate 96 sampling strategies that included different levels of replication, multiple approaches for sample allocation amongst strata, and both simple random and weighted probability sampling (i.e., weights proportional to local rail abundance) of sample units within strata. Effective monitoring surveyed ≥ 20–30% of the sampling frame on ≥ 3 occasions, with weighted sample selection and more targeted sampling (50% of units) for strata that are key to species recovery. We also tested Bayesian N-mixture models for estimating abundance and show that multiple models provide reasonable estimates. This work lays the foundation for statistical sampling and multi-scale population estimation for an endangered bird, and for refinement of abundance estimation models. Moreover, this work provides a replicable process for building customized and statistically defensible sampling frameworks to assess recovery of endangered species that can be used for other sensitive species.
Funder
US Fish and Wildlife Service
San Diego Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Barton ML (2016) Nesting preferences of the light-footed Ridgway’s rail in two southern California wetlands. M.S. thesis, California State University, Long Beach, California, USA
2. Bayraktarov E, Ehmke G, O’Connor J, Burns EL, Nguyen HA, McRae L, Possingham HP, Lindenmayer DB (2019) Do big unstructured biodiversity data mean more knowledge? Front Ecol Evol 6:e239
3. Bui TVD, Takekawa JY, Overton CT, Schultz ER, Hull JM, Casazza ML (2015) Movements of radio-marked California Ridgway’s rails during monitoring surveys: implications for population monitoring. J Fish Wild Man 6:227–237
4. Campbell SP, Clark JA, Crampton LH, Guerry AD, Hatch LT, Hosseini PR, Lawler JJ, O’Connor RJ (2002) An assessment of monitoring efforts in endangered species recovery plans. Ecol Appl 12:674–681
5. Conroy MJ, Runge MC, Nichols JD, Stodola KW, Cooper RJ (2011) Conservation in the face of climate change: the roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty. Biol Cons 144:1204–1213