Author:
Peschko Verena,Schwemmer Henriette,Mercker Moritz,Markones Nele,Borkenhagen Kai,Garthe Stefan
Abstract
AbstractGovernments are under increasing pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and large-scale wind farms are being developed in marine environments worldwide. However, top predators are strongly affected by environmental change and anthropogenic activities. Common guillemots (Uria aalge, hereafter guillemots), as one of the world’s most numerous seabird species, are prone to interference with offshore wind farms (OWFs). This study assessed the cumulative impacts of all operating OWFs on guillemots in the German North Sea. These estimates were applied to quantify the possible conflicts between guillemot occurrence and current German government plans to implement large-scale OWFs. If OWFs were implemented according to the current maritime spatial plan for the German Exclusive Economic zone, they would cover 13% of the German North Sea. Guillemot numbers peak during autumn, with German North Sea offshore waters hosting approximately 90,000 individuals. Guillemot density in autumn was significantly reduced within a radius of 19.5 km around operating OWFs. Applying this disturbance distance to current installation plans, about 70% of the German North Sea would be affected, and an estimated 68% of guillemots in the German North Sea would experience habitat loss. This highlights the possible threat to guillemots in the southern North Sea if the current German government plans are implemented. The current estimates are highly relevant to decisions regarding marine spatial planning and management recommendations. Such evaluations are essential for developing sustainable scenarios including reducing the human CO2 footprint, whilst also conserving biodiversity.
Funder
Bundesamt für Naturschutz
German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference112 articles.
1. Alessandrini A, Guizzardi D, Janssens-Maenhout G, Pisoni E, Trombetti M, Vespe M (2017) Estimation of shipping emissions using vessel Long Range Identification and Tracking data. J Maps 13:946–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1411842
2. BirdLife International (2015) Uria aalge. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T22694841A60108623. Downloaded on 27 May 2020
3. BirdLife International (2021) Uria aalge. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T22694841A166288433. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-3.RLTS.T22694841A166288433.en. Accessed 20 June 2023
4. Borkenhagen K, Markones N, Garthe S (2019) Das Wirbeltiermonitoring in den deutschen Meeresgebieten und die Rolle digitaler Erfassungen im Monitoringkonzept. Jahrbuch Für Naturschutz Und Landschaftspflege 62:56–60
5. BSH (2017) Bundesfachplan Offshore für die deutsche ausschließliche Wirtschaftszone der Nordsee 2016/2017 und Umweltbericht https://www.offshore-stiftung.de/sites/offshorelink.de/files/documents/BFO_Nordsee_2016_2017.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2023