The Digital Trinity—Controllable Human Evolution—Implicit Everyday Religion

Author:

Latzer Michael

Abstract

AbstractHow can the ubiquitous digitalization in the early twenty-first century be grasped and characterized? A media-change perspective that focuses on innovation-driven, complex co-evolutionary processes distinguishes two phases of digitalization and points to the following characteristics of its second phase: digitalization is an intertwined bundle of socio-technological transformation processes that reveals itself as a trinity of datafication, algorithmization and platformization. On the industry and politics side, this co-evolutionary trinity is driven by the belief in a scientifically and technologically controllable human evolution, reflected in the pursuit of nano-bio-info-cogno convergence, and accordingly linked to a transhumanism standing for this belief. On the users’ side, the digital trinity is characterized and driven by the convergence of digital technology and religion in the form of an implicit everyday religion. These hallmarks of digitalization lead to a digitally transformed social order, shaped by the interplay of governance by and of this digital trinity, and challenged by growing complexity.

Funder

University of Zurich

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference110 articles.

1. Anderson, Chris. 2008. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired https://bit.ly/2NhRgrp (Accessed: 26 Jan. 2021).

2. Annas, George J., Lori B. Andrews and Rosario M. Isasi. 2002. Protecting the Endangered Human. American journal of law & medicine 28(2–3):151–178.

3. Baecker, Dirk. 2016. Sociology of Media. In Social Media—New Masses, eds. Inge Baxman, Timon Beyes and Claus Pias, 151–171. Zürich: Diaphanes.

4. Baecker, Dirk. 2017. Wie verändert die Digitalisierung unser Denken und unseren Umgang mit der Welt? In Handel 4.0, eds. Rainer Gläß and Bernd Leukert, 3–24. Berlin: Springer.

5. Baecker, Dirk. 2020. Wir zählen nicht nur bis eins. In (Un)ergründlich? Künstliche Intelligenz als Ordnungsstifterin, eds. Karoline Krenn, Simon Hunt and Peter Parycek, 27–48. Berlin: Kompetenzzentrum Öffentliche IT.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3