Examining the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Work Quality: Substitution Potential and Work Exposure in Gender-Specific Occupations

Author:

Dengler Katharina,Tisch Anita

Abstract

AbstractComputers can substitute for many tasks currently performed by humans and are likely to change occupations in the near future. However, it is not likely that entire occupations will disappear. In this context, little attention has been paid to possible impacts of digital transformation on aspects of work quality. It would be desirable for changes to ease occupations with high work exposure. In this article, we assume that digital technologies may replace physically demanding jobs mainly performed by men, but not psychosocially demanding jobs mainly performed by women. Thus, the question arises whether social inequality between men and women may increase in the course of digital transformation. Using large-scale administrative and survey data from Germany, we analyse the relationship between digital transformation and work exposure for male- and female-dominated occupations. We measure the degree of digital transformation by occupation-specific substitution potential, that is the extent to which occupational tasks can be replaced by computers or computer-controlled machines. The results imply that digital technologies could relieve men of physically demanding jobs. However, we cannot find any evidence that digital technologies have already caused employment to decline in occupations with physical work exposure.

Funder

Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference58 articles.

1. Achatz, Juliane. 2008. Geschlechtersegregation im Arbeitsmarkt. In Arbeitsmarktsoziologie. Probleme, Theorien, empirische Befunde, eds. Martin Abraham and Thomas Hinz, 263–301. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

2. Adolph, Lars, Isabel Rothe and Armin Windel. 2016. Arbeit in der digitalen Welt – Mensch im Mittelpunkt. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 70:77–81.

3. Ahlers, Elka. 2016. Flexible and Remote Work in the Context of Digitization and Occupational Health. International Journal of Labour Research 8(1–2):85–101.

4. Allmendinger, Jutta, and Richard J. Hackman. 1995. The More, the Better? Social Forces 74:423–460.

5. Arnold, Daniel, Sebastian Butschek, Susanne Steffes and Dana Müller. 2016. Digitalisierung am Arbeitsplatz. Aktuelle Ergebnisse einer Betriebs- und Beschäftigtenbefragung. Berlin: BMAS.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3