Abstract
AbstractPrevious studies have documented gender differences in fields of study as well as interest in school subjects. Boys are on average more interested in mathematics, and girls show greater interest in languages. The extent to which these disparities are the result of biological or environment influences is still an open debate. On the one hand, brain organisation theory suggests that physiological and behavioural differences may be linked to prenatal hormone levels. On the other hand, sociological and psychological perspectives highlight the importance of gender socialisation. This paper combines biological, psychological, and sociological perspectives to examine the emergence of gendered academic interests in children.The study draws on data from 9‑year-old children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Our results suggest that for both boys and girls, medium to high compared with low prenatal exposure to circulating maternal testosterone might increase children’s interests in mathematics relative to English, although results vary depending on how prenatal testosterone exposure is measured. As the distributions of prenatal androgen exposure and the relationships with maths versus English interests are very similar for boys and girls, prenatal androgen exposure does not contribute to explaining gender differences in academic interests. However, we find some evidence that the relationship with parental gender socialisation varies by prenatal androgen exposure. A more gender-equal parental division of domestic work is more strongly associated with less gendered academic interests for girls with low prenatal androgen exposure and for boys with medium to high androgen exposure.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen
Female Center for Scientific and Medical Colleges, King Saud University
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference79 articles.
1. Alexander, Gerianne M. 2003. An Evolutionary Perspective of Sex-Typed Toy Preferences: Pink, Blue, and the Brain. Archives of Sexual Behavior 32:7–14.
2. Archer, John. 2019. The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews 94:1381–415.
3. Auyeung, Bonnie, Simon Baron-Cohen, Emma Ashwi, Rebecca Knickmeyer, Kevin Taylor, Gerald Hackett and Melissa Hines. 2009. Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behavior in girls and in boys. Psychological Science 20:144–48.
4. Bandura, Albert. 1971. Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
5. Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2003. The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain. New York and London: Penguin/Basic Books.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Behavioural Endocrinology in the Social Sciences;KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie;2024-03-26