Abstract
AbstractThe article focusses on the generating mechanisms of residential segregation for the demand side of housing markets, i.e., discriminatory residential preferences of inhabitants regarding the composition of their neighborhood. The data stem from an online survey among a random sample of the population of a mid-sized German city. In a vignette experiment, respondents were asked to rate example residential settings with respect to their attractiveness. The settings varied regarding the ethnic and religious composition of the neighborhood and other neighborhood characteristics that are positively or negatively related to residential attractiveness.We find that respondents have discriminatory residential preferences toward migrants and the presence of a Muslim community in the neighborhood. One-half of the migrant effect is mitigated if other positively connoted residential characteristics exist. We take this as an indication for statistical discrimination. This does not hold for the “Muslim community” effect. Discrimination gets stronger with higher levels of perceived economic group-threat from migrants. We further find evidence for a cultural group-threat and for the contact hypothesis: religious people are more discriminatory than nonreligious people, and real-life contact with migrants entails less discrimination.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universität Konstanz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference67 articles.
1. Aldén, Lina, Mats Hammarstedt and Emma Neuman. 2015. Ethnic segregation, tipping behavior, and native residential mobility. International Migration Review 49:36–69.
2. Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Allport, Gordon W. 1966. The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 5:447–457.
4. Apap, Joanna. 2002. Shaping Europe’s migration policy new regimes for the employment of third country nationals: A comparison of strategies in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK. European Journal of Migration and Law 4:309–328.
5. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1973. The theory of discrimination. In Discrimination in labor markets, eds. Orley Ashenfelter and Albert Rees, 3–33. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Migration und ethnische Ungleichheiten;Handbuch Sozialstrukturanalyse;2024