Applying Machine Learning in Sociology: How to Predict Gender and Reveal Research Preferences

Author:

Heiberger Raphael H.

Abstract

AbstractApplications of machine learning (ML) in industry and natural sciences yielded some of the most impactful innovations of the last decade (for instance, artificial intelligence, gene prediction or search engines) and changed the everyday-life of many people. From a methodological perspective, we can differentiate between unsupervised machine learning (UML) and supervised machine learning (SML). While SML uses labeled data as input to train algorithms in order to predict outcomes of unlabeled data, UML detects underlying patterns in unlabeled observations by exploiting the statistical properties of the data. The possibilities of ML for analyzing large datasets are slowly finding their way into the social sciences; yet, it lacks systematic introductions into the epistemologically alien subject. I present applications of some of the most common methods for SML (i.e., logistic regression) and UML (i.e., topic models). A practical example offers social scientists a “how-to” description for utilizing both. With regard to SML, the case is made by predicting gender of a large dataset of sociologists. The proposed approach is based on open-source data and outperforms a popular commercial application (genderize.io). Utilizing the predicted gender in topic models reveals the stark thematic differences between male and female scholars that have been widely overlooked in the literature. By applying ML, hence, the empirical results shed new light on the longstanding question of gender-specific biases in academia.

Funder

Universität Stuttgart

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference68 articles.

1. Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

2. Abramo, Giovanni, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo and Flavia Di Costa. 2019. A Gender Analysis of Top Scientists’ Collaboration Behavior: Evidence from Italy. Scientometrics 120(2):405–418.

3. Ahlquist, John S., and Christian Breunig. 2012. Model-Based Clustering and Typologies in the Social Sciences. Political Analysis 20(1):92–112.

4. Anderson, Ashton, Dan McFarland and Dan Jurafsky. 2012. Towards a Computational History of the ACL: 1980–2008. In Proceedings of the ACL-2012 Special Workshop on Rediscovering 50 Years of Discoveries, ACL ’12, 13–21. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.

5. Barone, Carlo. 2011. Some Things Never Change: Gender Segregation in Higher Education across Eight Nations and Three Decades. Sociology of Education 84(2):157–176.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3