Sozialer Zusammenhalt im internationalen Vergleich: ein Überblick über zentrale Maße und Befunde

Author:

Delhey Jan,Dragolov Georgi,Boehnke Klaus

Abstract

AbstractAlthough social integration has always been a central sociological issue, there has never been a consensus how to approach the topic empirically. In the new millennium, social cohesion has emerged as a lead concept for measuring how integrated societies are—not the least, because many observers see the social fabric of modern-day societies in deep crisis. Consequently, scholars and think tanks have intensified their efforts to chart how strong the social glue of contemporary societies is, as well as which conditions strengthen or weaken it. The main goal of our article is to provide an overview of measures of social cohesion that have been specifically designed for cross-national comparisons. To this end, we compare selected measures with respect to what they measure, how, and for what purpose. We then highlight key empirical insights gained by these measures, touching upon the issues of levels, regimes, as well as determinants and outcomes of social cohesion. The review concludes that one of the measures, the Bertelsmann Social Cohesion Radar, stands out in terms of conceptual clarity, methodological sophistication, and richness of empirical findings.

Funder

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference64 articles.

1. Abbott, Pamela, Claire Wallace and Roger Sapsford. 2016. The Decent Society. Planning for Social Quality. New York: Routledge.

2. Arant, Regina, Mandi Larsen and Klaus Boehnke. 2016. Sozialer Zusammenhalt in Bremen. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

3. Arant, Regina, Georgi Dragolov and Klaus Boehnke. 2017. Sozialer Zusammenhalt in Deutschland 2017. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

4. Baur, Nina. 2014. Comparing Societies and Cultures. Challenges of Cross-Cultural Survey Research as an Approach to Spatial Analysis. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 39:257–291.

5. Berger-Schmitt, Regina. 2002. Considering Social Cohesion in Quality of Life Assessments. Concept and Measurement. Social Indicators Research 58:403–428.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3