Author:
Galindo-Pellicena M.Ángeles,Sala Nohemi,De Gaspar Ignacio,Iriarte Eneko,Blázquez-Orta Raquel,Arsuaga Juan Luis,Carretero José Miguel,García Nuria
Abstract
AbstractEvidence of dog consumption at the El Portalón de Cueva Mayor site (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain) from the Holocene is revealed for the first time. The taxonomical and taphonomical studies of the animal bones from the El Portalón site have been carried out. The morphological and metrical analyses indicate that 130 dog bone remains have been identified from the El Portalón site, including from the Neolithic (NISP = 23), Chalcolithic (Pre-Bell Beaker Chalcolithic and Bell Beaker Chalcolithic) (26), Early Bronze Age, Middle Bronze Age and Late Bronze Age (81). The anthropic evidence encompasses cut marks, fresh bone fractures, human tooth marks and fire modifications, thus constituting clear evidence of cynophagy, at least in the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age levels in different contexts (habitat and funerary) from the El Portalón site (Atapuerca, Burgos). Furthermore, the fire alterations on two bone remains from the Neolithic suggest likely dog consumption due to the domestic character of the stratigraphical units where these bone remains were found. The taphonomic evidence suggests that domestic dogs were, at least occasionally, part of the diet of the humans who inhabited the El Portalón site, a fact that might be caused either by food shortages and hunger or as dog meat was considered as a delicacy.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Archeology,Anthropology,Archeology
Reference141 articles.
1. Abril D, Nocete F, Riquelme JA, Bayona MR, Inácio N (2010) Zooarqueología del III Milenio A.N.E.: El barrio metalúrgico de Valencina de la Concepción (Sevilla). Complutum 21(1):87–100
2. Albizuri S, Nadal J, Martín P, Gibaja JF, Martín A, Esteve X, Oms FX, Martí M, Pou R, López D, Subirà ME (2019) Dogs in funerary contexts during the Middle Neolithic in the northeastern Iberian Peninsula (5th–early 4th millennium BCE). J Archaeol Sci Rep 24:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.01.004
3. Alférez Delgado F, Molero Gutiérrez G, Bustos Pretel V, Brea López P (1981) Apéndice II: La fauna de macromamíferos. Trabajos de Prehistoria 38:139e145
4. Andrés M, Gidna AO, Yravedra J, Domínguez-Rodrigo M (2012) A study of dimensional differences of tooth marks (pits and scores) on bones modified by small and large carnivores. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 4:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-012-0093-4
5. Andúgar Martínez L (2016) Análisis faunístico de los conjuntos calcolítico y argáricos de los yacimientos de Gatas (Turre, Almería) y La Bastida (Totana, Murcia). PhD. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Departamento de Prehistoria