Abstract
Abstract
Discussions on colonialism are pervasive in western scholarship but are hardly ever applied to the archeology of China. The present paper shows how concepts of colonialism and migration research can be successfully applied to understand Han imperial expansion into southwest China and how the Chinese material can in turn contribute to developing theories and methods of colonialism research further. Taking the Shamaoshan cemetery as a case study, the present paper combines archeological, textual, environmental, and isotope data to gain insights into strategies and processes of Han imperial expansion into southwest China. The insights gained here show that the long-accepted story-line of simple “Sinicization” and political control is far from accurate. Instead, it took over a century of cross-cultural exchange with immigrants and locals adopting each other’s customs to varying degrees. While in the beginning the Han seem to have taken a top-down approach to “civilizing” the region through their elites, the present study suggests that in the end it was the lower levels of society that intermingled most intensively and helped integrate migrants and locals successfully. Moving away from the exclusive focus on exceptional graves and large sites, the present study thus shows the great value of approaching small, poorly equipped graves with new methods, combining isotope research with a nuanced analysis of burial remains. Evaluated together with the evidence from the well-known exceptional graves, lesser-known settlement material, and historical accounts, the Shamaoshan case study has made it clear that various types of contact, colonial and otherwise, play out quite differently within different social groups and historical situations. This study thus proposes a multisource, multimethod approach that moves away from a narrative dominated by the history-writing elite segments of the colonizing force to a multivoiced account integrating local and outside perceptions at various social levels, an approach that might successfully be applied in other parts of the world.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Archeology,Anthropology,Archeology
Reference154 articles.
1. Aba Zangzu Zizhizhou Wenwu Guanlisuo 阿坝藏族自治州文物管理所, and Lixian Wenwuguan 理县文物馆 (1987) Sichuan Lixian Jiashan shiguanzang fajue qingli baogao 四川理县佳山石棺葬发掘清理报告. In Nanfang minzu kaogu. Diyi ji 南方民族考古. 第一辑. Sichuan Daxue Bowuguan 四川大学博物馆 and Zhongguo Gudai Tonggu Yanjiu Xuehui 中国古代铜鼓研究学会 (eds). Chengdu: Sichuan Daxue Chubanshe 四川大学出版社
2. Allard F (1998) Stirrings at the periphery: history, archaeology, and the study of Dian. Int J Hist Archaeol 2(4):321–341
3. Allard F (1999) The archaeology of Dian: trends and traditions. Antiquity 73:77–85
4. Allard F (2005) Frontiers and boundaries: the Han Empire from its southern periphery. In: Stark MT (ed) Archaeology of Asia. Blackwell, Malden, pp 233–245
5. Allard F (2015) China’s early impact on eastern Yunnan: incorporation, acculturation, and the convergence of evidence. J Indo-Pac Archaeol 35:26–35
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献