Abstract
AbstractGreat Zimbabwe (CE1000–1600) is world famous for outstanding cultural innovations and localised and globalised entanglement with trans-Africa and trans-Indian Ocean exchange. New excavations yielded fragments of over a hundred gold processing vessels comprising reused pottery and purpose-made crucibles from stratified contexts in the Eastern Ridge Ruins and adjacent areas. Selected samples were studied using archaeological, microscopic, and compositional (SEM–EDS) techniques. All ceramics were made of alumina-rich clays and contain minerals common to granite-derived lithologies typical of the area, although it is possible that particularly refractory clays were selected to make crucibles locally. These technical ceramics were used for refining and collecting gold at high temperature, most likely producing not only relatively standardised ingots but also finished objects. The composition of the gold prills set in crucible slag is consistent with that of natural, unalloyed gold, while the variability in silver levels and minor impurities point to heterogeneous sources of the gold. Considering these finds in their multiple site and regional contexts, and together with complementary threads of information from early reports of antiquarians and looters, we argue that local agency and gold consumption were much more significant than generally assumed. The conclusion to the paper is that Great Zimbabwe’s famous participation in local and global exchanges was backed by internally driven but improvisation laden production and consumption occurring in homesteads located throughout its various settlements. We end by raising a word of caution about oversimplified narratives of globalisation and their archaeological expressions (see Supplementary Material S0 for the abstract in Shona).
Funder
Royal Society
British Academy
National Research Foundation of South Africa
University of Cape Town
European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Archeology,Anthropology,Archeology
Reference93 articles.
1. Bandama F, Moffett AJ, Chirikure S (2017) Typological and technological attributes of metallurgical crucibles from Great Zimbabwe (1000–1700 CE)’s legacy collections. J Archaeol Sci Rep 12:646–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.029
2. Bandama F, Moffett AJ, Thondhlana TP, Chirikure S (2016) The production, distribution and consumption of metals and alloys at Great Zimbabwe. Archaeometry 58:164–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12248
3. Bayley J, Rehren T (2007) Towards a functional and typological classification of crucibles. In: Hook D, Craddock P (eds) La Niece S. Studies in Archaeometallurgy. Archetype Books, Metals and Mines, pp 46–55
4. Beach D (1998) Cognitive archaeology and imaginary history at Great Zimbabwe. Curr Anthropol 39:47–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/204698
5. Bisson MS (2000) Precolonial copper metallurgy: socio-political context. In: Childs TS, De Barros P, Holl AF, et al. (eds) Ancient African metallurgy: the Sociocultural Context. AltaMira Press